https://ijsmpcr.com/index.php/ijsmpcr <p>The major aim of the<strong> International Journal of Social Science, Management, Peace and Conflict Research (IJSMPCR)</strong> is to publish scholarly works in social science, management, peace and conflict studies. The Journal is a reputable journal committed to publishing sound research output in the field of social, management, peace and conflict studies. It is a Multidisciplinary Journal that publishes manuscripts (Original Research articles, Review articles, Short communication, Case reports and Case Studies) on original work, either experimental or theoretical. IJSMPCR is an International Journal publishing Scientific Research Online. It is peer reviewed, highly indexed, open access, monthly published Journal.</p> <p> </p> testing en-US International Journal of Social Science, Management, Peace and Conflict Research (IJSMPCR) 2992-314X https://ijsmpcr.com/index.php/ijsmpcr/article/view/131 <p><em>Since 1999, Nigeria has recorded over two decades of uninterrupted democratic rule, peaceful transfers of power, and institutional frameworks for human rights protection yet citizens face escalating banditry, vandalism of Critical National Assets and infrastructure (CNAI), kidnapping, herder aggression on farmers, separatist violence, and police brutality that consistently place the country low on global peace and security indices. Anchored on&nbsp;Institutional Federalism Theory, this study interrogates democracy and security provisioning in Nigeria, myth or reality? The study engaged a qualitative doctrinal and analytical approach with constitutional instruments, scholarly literature, policy documents. The study finds that democracy has produced genuine institutional gains, agency to respond to CNAI protection, constitutional rights frameworks, the National Human Rights Commission, the Police Service Commission, power devolution from federal to States, and peaceful political transitions, but these have not translated into meaningful security improvements for ordinary citizens. This failure is attributed not to democracy's inadequacy but to the&nbsp;incomplete extension of federal principles to the security sector, which remains centralized and unaccountable in a federal state. Structural impediments identified are centralized policing authority, jurisdictional fragmentation among overlapping federal agencies, fiscal misalignment at subnational levels, and political manipulation of security forces. The proposed State Police and LGA autonomy reforms represent theoretically sound federalism applications validated by comparative evidence, but their success is conditional on robust constitutional safeguards, adequate fiscal transfers, clear coordination protocols, and strong civilian oversight to prevent gubernatorial abuse, coordination failure, and ethnic fragmentation. The study concludes that democratic security provisioning in Nigeria is neither a myth nor a full reality, it is a&nbsp;work in progress&nbsp;dependent on deliberate constitutional engineering. The study recommends a Constitutional Amendment establishing State Police with federal standards, prohibition on political deployment, a dedicated Security Trust Fund; a Security Sector Harmonization Act eliminating jurisdictional fragmentation and mandating intelligence-sharing; LGA financial autonomy with a Community Policing Framework; State Police Service Commissions and context-specific deployment strategies by state governments; comprehensive accountability reforms including body-worn cameras, public accountability reporting by security institutions; and active civil society and citizen participation in police oversight and community policing. These sequenced recommendations offer Nigeria an evidence-based pathway to transform its democratic security promise from aspiration into lived reality.</em></p> Paul Seun SOSINA PhD Gloria Ekeh EMMANUEL PhD Wan Mantu CHONGS PhD Adedotun Sunday KESHINRO Ezekiel Rotimi ONIBIYO Copyright (c) 2026 ijsmpcr 2026-07-05 2026-07-05 4 01 086 102